Introduction

For our project in the Visualizing cultural collections course offered by Marian Dörk, we chose the Amazonian Future Lab (AFL) as our data partner. The AFL describes itself as following on their website:

“In close cooperation between Brazilian and German partners, digital tools are being developed within the framework of the project. From different perspectives, they bundle and connect information on collection objects. A central challenge is to convey the diverse approaches in their complexity. In this way, historically grown separations between collection institutions are to be overcome. Disciplinary and institutional logics of organization and classification are taken into account as well as indigenous knowledge orders and practices. Historical ethnographic and botanical collections from the Brazilian Amazon region and cultural-historical collections for their contextualization (including field diaries, photographs, maps, sound recordings, films, secondary literature) serve as case studies. These artifacts, plants, and documents have been collected over the last 200 years and stored, classified, conserved, restored, and researched in the Ethnological Museum, the Botanical Museum and Botanical Garden, and the Ibero-American Institute. Only a part of these extensive collections have been explored in greater depth and are available digitally. So far, the collections have not yet been connected across institutions and countries.

The general aim of the project is to use the potential of digital formats and tools to communicate, exchange, network and jointly create new knowledge from different perspectives, knowledge practices and social contexts. The connected knowledge will be publicly accessible in its processuality, via interactive formats of exploration and participation. The tools created will subsequently be made freely available and can thus be used or further developed by other communities and institutions that are engaged in the field of participatory cultural education.” (Amazonian Future Lab. 2020)

Project partners are Dr. Andrea Scholz (Ethnological Museum/SMB of the SPK) SPK-internal partners: Prof. Dr. Barbara Göbel, Ibero-American Institute (SPK); Dr. Patricia Rahemipour, Institute for Museum Research (SMB of the SPK)

Additional partners are the following: Prof. Dr. Thomas Borsch, Botanical Garden and Botanical Museum (Freie Universität Berlin), Berlin; Dr. Thiago da Costa Oliveira (Alexander von Humboldt Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow at the Ethnological Museum Berlin); Prof. Dr. Carlos Fausto, Museu Nacional Rio de Janeiro (Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (Amazonian Future Lab. 2020).

The Digital Culture Programme of the German Federal Cultural Foundation is currently providing the funding for the AFL. (Amazonian Future Lab. 2020.)

The AFL was an interesting data partner for our group because of the cooperation and the connection of different international partners with the ultimate goal of providing accessibility and preservation of the cultural heritage of communities within the Amazonian region in Brazil. Yet, their approach for the project we got involved with does not just focus on collecting objects and placing them in an analogue collection or database (a practice one connotes with institutions and archives) but also on regaining information on the intangible cultural heritage of communities like the Baniwa Women, with the ultimate goal to revive the cultural practice of the community.

Therefore, one could argue that the AFL is practicing a joint act of restitution of knowledge through different institutions and access points. In a way this might be a best practice case of intangible restitution, as the focus here does not lie on returning the objects, but rather on creating access to pieces of a cultural practice that was almost displaced and forgotten even by the Baniwa community, due to colonial interference.

What was the most interesting to us, was the question of how to document and visualize intangible cultural heritage and practices, as one cannot simply create a collection out of a practice. Because, while the practice of creating the ceramics of the Baniwa Women is very much intertwined with tools and objects, the finished products might not be the most important parts but rather the practice itself and everything that surrounds it.

So, how can we visualize this practice and get potentially interested individuals to get engaged and invest time and attention into as many aspects of the cultural practice as possible? Preferably without actually sending them into the Amazonian forest. And how can we avoid the usual academic approach of lists, descriptions and reports that (mostly European) anthropologists used until the anthropological turns and crisis in the 1980ies and 1990ies (Paleček, M. & Risjord, M. 2013)?  Especially considering that our group is not consisting of people from the community, whose cultural heritage we are currently working with. Also, how can we create this project appropriately, without recreating colonial perspectives that almost erased this cultural practice in the past?